Package: tagcoll
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: important

Ciao Enrico,

Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1.  I'm filing this bug as
important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in
unstable (probably in a few weeks) I'll upgrade this to serious.


> Automatic build of tagcoll_1.6-1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94
...
> if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. 
> -I.. -I.. -DCOMPILE_TESTSUITE    -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -MT Patches.lo -MD -MP 
> -MF ".deps/Patches.Tpo" -c -o Patches.lo Patches.cc; \
>       then mv -f ".deps/Patches.Tpo" ".deps/Patches.Plo"; else rm -f 
> ".deps/Patches.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
>  g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DCOMPILE_TESTSUITE -g -Wall -O2 -Wall 
> -MT Patches.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Patches.Tpo -c Patches.cc  -fPIC -DPIC -o 
> Patches.o
> Patches.cc: In member function 'void Tagcoll::PatchList<T1, 
> T2>::addPatch(const Tagcoll::Patch<ITEM, TAG>&) [with ITEM = 
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, TAG = 
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >]':
> Patches.cc:161:   instantiated from here
> Patches.cc:67: error: no matching function for call to 'find(const 
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&)'
> Patches.cc: In member function 'Tagcoll::OpSet<TAG> Tagcoll::PatchList<T1, 
> T2>::patch(const ITEM&, const Tagcoll::OpSet<TAG>&) const [with ITEM = 
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, TAG = 
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >]':
> Patches.cc:161:   instantiated from here
> Patches.cc:94: error: no matching function for call to 'find(const 
> std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&)'
> make[4]: *** [Patches.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/tagcoll-1.6/tagcoll'

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to