On 2019-01-10 20:31:10 [+0100], Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:57:31PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 12:51:56PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 2017-11-11 12:37:15 [+0100], To Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > > > So the problem was that you never shutdown the connection. You can blame > > > > libssl that it behaves differently or you can apply the first patch > > > > attached. > > > > The second one replaces SSL_copy_session_id() with something maybe more > > > > obvious and with more documentation. > > > > > > okay. This time with the patch attached… > > > > Gentle ping after a year :-) > > Or should we rather remove netkit-ftp-ssl? There are TLS-capable ftp client > alternatives in the archive still, e.g. lftp.
I provided a patch after Mats described how bad the new openssl is. I never got and reply and I will not cry if it gets RMed. There is also #912126 [0] was set pending by Christoph on Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:39:06 GMT. It would be good to know if Christoph plans to address both issues or just the one in #912126. Eitherway, both need to be fixed in order to get this to testing. And it would a waste if it gets RMed after adressing #912126. [0] [S|P|] [src:netkit-ftp-ssl] netkit-ftp-ssl misses the generator for configure > Cheers, > Moritz Sebastian
