Hi Francois, as you said the content of the package is the same across the listed architectures. The reason why rear package is not "all" is that it's not supported on all architecture by the upstream. To be honest, I don't know if making it "all" would cause much trouble.
F. On Thu, 17 May 2018 20:57:46 +0200, Francois Gouget <fgou...@free.fr> wrote: > Package: rear > Version: 2.3+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I compared the files of the amd64, i386 and ppc64el binary packages and they > are > all strictly identical. Thus the rear package is architecture independent and > should be marked as such. > > That means: > * Setting Architecture: all > * Removing the Multi-Arch tag which becomes irrelevant. > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (500, 'testing') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > Foreign Architectures: amd64 > > Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > Versions of packages rear depends on: > ii attr 1:2.4.47-2+b2 > ii bc 1.07.1-2+b1 > ii binutils 2.30-15 > ii dosfstools 4.1-1 > ii e2fsprogs 1.44.1-2 > ii ethtool 1:4.15-1 > ii fdisk 2.32-0.1 > ii gawk 1:4.1.4+dfsg-1+b1 > ii iproute2 4.16.0-2 > ii iputils-ping 3:20161105-1 > ii isolinux 3:6.03+dfsg1-2 > ii lsb-release 9.20170808 > ii openssl 1.1.0h-2 > ii parted 3.2-21 > ii syslinux 3:6.03+dfsg1-2 > ii syslinux-common 3:6.03+dfsg1-2 > ii util-linux 2.32-0.1 > ii xorriso 1.4.8-3 > > Versions of packages rear recommends: > ii extlinux 3:6.03+dfsg1-2 > ii nfs-common [nfs-client] 1:1.3.4-2.2 > ii rpcbind [portmap] 0.2.3-0.6 > > rear suggests no packages. > > -- Configuration Files: > /etc/rear/local.conf [Errno 13] Permission non accordée: > '/etc/rear/local.conf' > > -- no debconf information
pgp0WtTBfK4SJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
