[Dmitry Bogatov]
>> No objections, but note there used to be several scripts in rcS.d/
>> depending on /usr/ being mounted, and these need to be moved from S to
>> (2 3 4 5) first.
>
> As far as I can tell, we can assume /usr being mounted (if it is
> separate from /) at time /sbin/init is launched.

Even on diskless workstations and thin clients using LTSP?  It is the
use case I know about, but it is years since I tracked its status, so I
do not know if it is still an issue there.

> Another issue is that definition of $remote_fs is *all* file systems are
> mounted. And there is some scripts, which 'Default-Start: S', depending
> on $remote_fs.  Seems to get this issue resolved, we need to get
> following list of packages to get rid of dependency on $remote_fs or
> move to (2 3 4 5) runlevels. Correct?

I can not confirm the list, but yes, every script in rcS.d/ depending on
$remote_fs will have to move to (2 3 4 5).  Traditionally (as in
Solaris/SysV systems) mounting /usr/ was done in rc[2345].d/, but this
was for some strange reason never done in Debian.  I tried to move
$remote_fs there, but ran out of steem before I managed to convince
enough maintainers to do the switch.

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply via email to