Hello, On 12/16/18 10:06 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote: >> Sorry for the delay and thanks to invest time on this issue. >> >> On 18/05/18 23:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:17:35PM +0100, Rémi wrote: >>>> you are right, I have not been active on djmount for quite some time now. >>>> I tried to find a volonteer to maintain it at the time, but it didn't >>>> happen. >>>> >>>> I am sorry I don't have the right setup to validate these patches :-/ >>>> So removing should be considered, unless a maintainer can be found. >>> >>> What is your POV on this? Is djmount worth fixing, or should we remove >>> it? If the former, can you give test feedback on the patches I already >>> sent? >>> >> >> >> I need to setup an environment to include libupnp10 (upnp 1.8) and >> implement provided patches. >> >> I lack of free time right now, but will engage on this as soon as I >> can. >> >> Again sorry for the delay. > > The current situation is that djmount is the last package that is using > libupnp6. (Well, there is still linux-igd, but this is about to be > removed -> #916643)
linux-igd is gone. > djmount was already removed from testing. I wonder if we should also > remove it from unstable given that there happened nothing to make > djmount build with libupnp-1.8 for a year. I will report a request to remove djmount from unstable in February unless someone opposes (and does to work to convert it to libupnp-1.8). Best regards Uwe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
