Quoting Daniel Lange (2019-01-22 12:29:41) > > I was wondering what your plans are for Netatalk in Buster? > > 1) stay on 2.2.x > > 2) adopt the newer packages for 3.1.x (still maintained at > > https://github.com/adiknoth/netatalk-debian as per bug #690227) > > 3) RM netatalk
[reposted from private conversation] Thanks for asking! I am unaware of what Samba provides - do you have a good link for that? Do you know if it offers AFP (Apple Filesharing Protocol), or it is recent systems gaining support for SMB - because if it is the latter then I believe it still makes sense to maintain Netatalk - e.g. for those wanting to connect from the internet to an AFP share. My current conservative plan is 1). I may find time to introduce Netatalk 3.x as a separate package. But to get that into Buster will need someone testing if it works. You, perhaps? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
