On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Boud Roukema, le mer. 23 janv. 2019 15:53:42 +0100, a ecrit:Though shouldn't it be 'include <mach.h>' ?For the case of GNU Mach, yes. But as the compatibility header suggests, <mach/mach.h> might be more portable.
OK, that makes sense. Looking at your patch and RTFMing a bit, I now see that some versions of Mach are being very actively used - by macOS/iOS. Cheers Boud
