* Anonymous <anonym...@hoi-polloi.org> [2015-06-02 20:59]: > If gc support was lost upstream, then the fix is not to march ahead > and introduce a serious problem. Why have a debian "stable", with > testing, and diligence, the whole nine yards if they're going to > wildly upgrade packages to versions that break? > > Not sure about others, but for me this is catastrophic. I used ledger > exclusively to harvest data from gnucash. Gnucash is the best user > interface, while gnucash is atrocious for scripting and automation > (which ledger was good at). Gnucash and ledger need each other.
ledger 3 is basically a rewrite of ledger 2. Gnucash support was lost as part of this. There have been calls upstream for a volunteer to implement Gnucash support. If you feel strongly about this, please go ahead and volunteer to implement Gnucash support upstream. As mentioned, there's a Python script to convert from Gnucash to ledger: https://github.com/MatzeB/pygnucash I suggest this bug report be closed as there is no work upstream to implement Gnucash support. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/
