Hi Emilio, it build just fine, i currently run it, i uploaded it to my private repo with an attached build server before.
The new version is important. PCManFM-Qt is the main part of LXQt, the new released version is the finished porting to C++ with lots of bug fixes and enhancements. Further more - the version that is currently in sid and testing should under no circumstances go to stable - reason: it isn't. We was forced upstream to do the migration stepwise, 0.13 was the first step needed. 0.14.0 is the polished version with only a few new functionality and lots of fixed bugs (major and minor). Might sound hard, but i would not have the needed thick skin and the balls to put this into stable, it would be a clear dis-service for our users. I guess that there might be some symbol bugs in some architectures but they will be easy to fix. amd64 and i386 should just build fine. https://github.com/lxqt/libfm-qt/blob/master/CHANGELOG - that is the very condensed form of the changes, i find the git log unreadable for mere humans - even if i should know what we have changed. Alf On 30.01.19 20:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/01/2019 19:28, Alf Gaida wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> >> >> impacted packages: >> * pcmanfm-qt >> * lximage-qt >> >> The new release of LXQt was after transition freeze, there are only these >> two dependend packages, >> so i don't know that this need a transition. The sources of pcmanfm-qt and >> lximage-qt are already >> uploaded and in the repo. Sorry for the mess, my current knowledge was that >> transitions are >> only needed if more than a handful of packages are involved. > > It's best to ask during the freeze even if there are only a few rdeps. > > - Do the rdeps build fine against the new libfm-qt? > - Can you get this into experimental first so that we can check that there are > no issues, e.g. that the package builds on all architectures? > - Why is this new version important? Any bug fixes or important features that > you think should be in buster? > > Emilio >