Commenting on 918984. Thank you. Someone else with admin privileges could do this.
Il giorno sab 2 feb 2019 alle ore 09:46 <bart...@fenski.pl> ha scritto: > Hey folks, and sorry for late response. > I'm currently totally out of time so Fabio feel free to upload new > sshfs. > > regards > Bartosz Feński > > > On 2019-01-11 15:08, Fabio Pedretti wrote: > > Source: fuse3 > > Version: 3.4.1-1 > > Severity: important > > > > (Original message follows, apparently something went wrong and no bug > > was created) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > From: Mo Zhou <lu...@debian.org> > > Date: mer 9 gen 2019 alle ore 16:17 > > Subject: Re: Bug#871019: sshfs: Please update to 3.x > > To: <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > > Cc: <871...@bugs.debian.org>, Bartosz Fenski <fe...@debian.org>, Fabio > > Pedretti <fabio.pedre...@unibs.it> > > > > Package: fuse3 > > Version: 3.4.1-1 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I still cannot co-install fuse3/3.4.1-1 and fuse/2.9.9-1 . > > > > gnome-core (depends on ?gvfs? (depends on fuse)) got removed when I'm > > trying to install fuse3. > > > > I packaged sshfs 3.5.1 for myself and used it for a while. The > > performance improvement compared to 2.X is significant. I hope > > the co-install problem could be solved so that we'll still have > > a chance to get sshfs 3.X into Buster. > > > > @Bartosz: Do you have plan to upload sshfs 3.X to Buster? If you need > > help, I volunteer to do it. > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Fabio Pedretti wrote: > >> Il giorno lun 7 gen 2019 alle ore 14:26 Mo Zhou <lu...@debian.org> ha > >> scritto: > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:48:32PM +0100, Fabio Pedretti wrote: > >> > ~ ❯❯❯ sudo apt install fuse > >> > Reading package lists... Done > >> > Building dependency tree > >> > Reading state information... Done > >> > The following packages were automatically installed and are > >> no longer > >> > required: > >> > [...] > >> > Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them. > >> > The following packages will be REMOVED: > >> > fuse3 sshfs sshfs-dbgsym > >> > The following NEW packages will be installed: > >> > fuse > >> > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 3 to remove and 2 not > >> upgraded. > >> > Need to get 0 B/72.0 kB of archives. > >> > After this operation, 243 kB disk space will be freed. > >> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] > >> > > >> > How are they "co-installable"??? > >> > > >> > Thanks for the feedback. Since recently released fuse3 3.4.1-1 > >> this issue > >> > should be fixed, this bug has more info: > >> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912528 > >> > > >> > Are you using 3.4.1-1? If so maybe this issue was not entirely > >> addressed. > >> > >> Yes. The sshfs package as shown above is built by myself[1] > >> > >> > >> I think this is unexpected, given 912528 was supposed to fix this. > >> > >> Maybe you could add these info on 912528, or opening a new bug against > >> fuse3, > >> so that the maintainer has a chance to fix it. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> > >> ~ ❯❯❯ apt list libfuse\* --installed > >> Listing... Done > >> libfuse2/unstable,unstable,unstable,now 2.9.8-2 amd64 > >> [installed,automatic] > >> libfuse3-3/unstable,unstable,unstable,now 3.4.1-1 amd64 > >> [installed,automatic] > >> libfuse3-dev/unstable,unstable,unstable,now 3.4.1-1 amd64 > >> [installed] > >> ~ ❯❯❯ apt list fuse\* --installed > >> Listing... Done > >> fuse3/unstable,unstable,unstable,now 3.4.1-1 amd64 > >> [installed,automatic] > >> ~ ❯❯❯ apt list sshfs\* --installed > >> Listing... Done > >> sshfs-dbgsym/now 3.5.1-1 amd64 [installed,local] > >> sshfs/now 3.5.1-1 amd64 [installed,local] > >> > >> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/sshfs-fuse > -- ing. Fabio Pedretti Responsabile U.O.C. "Reti, Sistemi e Sicurezza Informatica" https://www.unibs.it/node/4305 Università degli Studi di Brescia Via Valotti, 9 - 25121 Brescia E-mail: fabio.pedre...@unibs.it -- Informativa sulla Privacy: http://www.unibs.it/node/8155 <http://www.unibs.it/node/8155>
