> On Feb 5, 2019, at 1:17 AM, Martín Ferrari <tin...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 05/02/2019 06:41, Stephen Gelman wrote: > >> I totally understand your concern. I’m at least a few backported bug fixes >> deep and I am concerned the resulting package will have had so many changes >> applied that it will be a bit of a mess. > > Ouch. More reason to hold the upgrade then.
Sorry, I think you misinterpret what I mean: 0.34.1 works perfectly out of the box, I was referring to trying to get 0.9.0 working. At this point there have already been 7 debian revisions of 0.9.0 so regardless of the outcome here I think we should plan to upload a newer version in the near future (though I agree with your point about getting 0.9.0 patched first). >> As a middle ground, I think I can get 0.9.0 patched for now with the > intention of uploading a new version once we are out of hot water here. > Do you think that is reasonable? > > Yesm that sounds good. In fact, I was writing an email to you telling > you that I think the fix is pretty easy: the breakage is because > genproto removed a deprecated API > (google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/cloud/speech/v1beta1) that this > package depends on. The fix (as upstream did it) is to remove the > packages that reflect that API, and it is easy to backport. > > I have already been working on this for a while. That problem is fixed, > but there are still a few discrepancies with bigtable and spanner, which > I hope to fix soon and upload. Unless you had already fixed that? I am still getting through the spanner tests but I am pretty close to being done (I really truly hope). If you want to complete it I am happy to back off and let you but I’m also happy to finish going through them. Just let me know! Stephen
