Hi Nicolas, Le 13/02/2019 à 18:54, Nicolas Braud-Santoni a écrit :
> There is a name colision on cava, which is also an audio visualisation tool > for > which a RFP bug was open (#829287). By using the same name for the source > package, you caused the RFP for a completely-unrelated piece of software to be > closed. I fail to see why the name of the source package causes a problem. The Cava audio visualisation tool could be packaged with a source package named cava-audio-visualisation or cava-audio. Feel free to use the 'cava' name for the binary package, I don't think the Java package will ever need that. > Please consider changing the source package's name to cava-java (which seem to > be the idiom for java packages) or libcava-java. > > Considering that we entered freeze for the Buster release, I would definitely > understand holding off until after the release. If the Java package was to be renamed I'd rather suggest consensys-cava. And not during the freeze of course. Emmanuel Bourg