On Tue 2019-02-12 09:10:57 +0100, Ansgar wrote: > Maybe a separate implementation (like opentmpfiles for tmpfiles) would > be a better approach?
Yep, i see your point. I've now filed https://bugs.debian.org/922353 -- an ITP of a simple python3 implementation of the sd_listen_fds(3) convention that should provide something similar, so i'm closing this bug report. I welcome feedback on the "socket-activate" implementation from anyone interested in encouraging more widespread development of simple, socket-activated services. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
