Hi John,
thanks as well for reading this package.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 01:29:50PM +0000, John Marshall wrote:
> Source: htslib
>
> The packages built from this (notably libhts-dev,
I've fixed thie in Git[1]
> libhts2,
I do not think that it is necessary in this library package since the
README does not really contain information which is relevant for users
who simply install libhts2 as a dependency of other packages.
> the badly-named tabix)
Thanks for the interesting hint. What better name would you suggest. I
think its to late to change the name of the package for the upcoming
stable release but we would love to adapt to your wishes in the future.
> are missing the upstream release's README file. It would be good to install
> this file, even though it doesn't currently contain a great deal of salient
> information. (The upstream release's INSTALL file is also missing, but that
> is of course appropriate for binary packages.)
You are right. Its usually a bad idea to provide the INSTALL file since
the software was just install in the binary package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/htslib/commit/18fc49dd7454539a6276f75eb40775c96af37340
--
http://fam-tille.de
