Hi John,

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:12:18PM +0000, John Marshall wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 15:08, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 01:17:54PM +0000, John Marshall wrote:
> >> NEWS.Debian.gz contains an ancient "samtools (1.3-1) unstable; 
> >> urgency=medium" Debian changelog item.
> > 
> > Yes.  This is intended as well.  The file NEWS.Debian.gz is evaluated by
> > apt-listchanges[1] to inform local admins about changes that need to be
> > respected in a certain package version.
> 
> I see, and this is clearer now that I've read the text there more carefully. 
> Thanks.
> 
> Scripts and users can still use "samtools bamshuf ..." btw -- the old name 
> has not been removed, for obvious compatibility reasons.

Fixed in Git[1].  While this might not be visible any more for users who
upgrade from Debian 9 to the soon to be released Debian 10 this can be
relevant for those upgrading from Debian 8.  This seems to be a good
reason to push out the package now.
 
> >> The package is missing the upstream release's README file. It would be 
> >> good to install this file, even though it doesn't currently contain a 
> >> great deal of salient information. (The upstream release's INSTALL file is 
> >> also missing, but that is of course appropriate for a binary package.)
> > 
> > Done in Git[5]
> 
> Thanks. Similar comments to the other bug about README* and README vs. 
> README.md. However you should do what you see fit, and it may be immaterial 
> if starting from the upstream release tarball as there will be only one file 
> matching README*.

Yes, that's the idea.

Kind regards

         Andreas.

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/samtools/commit/d1997a0246ab6153410a142663b408e8fec3e0cc

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to