At least in the case of fltk1.3's originally reported failure, the culprit turned out to be texlive-latex-extra -- Doxygen's (preexisting) usage of (long)tabu wound up running afoul of #920459. I haven't had time to investigate the latest failure, but see a new tl-l-e showed up, and suspect an accidental regression on that front.
On February 27, 2019 5:53:43 AM EST, Dominik George <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >> > As the new doxygen will not make it into buster (as apparently, it >> > causes major breakage), there is no need to block reverse >dependencies >> > as long as they build with the doxygen currently in buster. >> > >> > (Mind that they actually do *not* currently build, but for anotehr >> > reason - see #921779). >> >> Hi. I don't fully understand this. >> >> For example: How is fltk1.3_1.3.4-8 supposed to propagate to testing >> when it FTBFS in the arch:all autobuilder? > >It failed, but due to another bug. > >Or maybe your bug reports are not clear enough - you are saying that >the >build will fail with doxygen 1.8.15, but doxygen 1.8.15 is not in >Debian >testing (and neither in sid). So *this* bug does not break the build >for >Debian buster. > >-nik -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
