Hi Sean,

On 08-03-2019 02:12, Sean Whitton wrote:
> No, I don't think so.  You have to think moderately hard to infer, "oh,
> stop uploading to sid" from that text.  I would suggest appending
> "I.e. only upload to sid changes for which you plan to request an unblock."

I the attached patch what you are looking for?

Paul
From 6bd6b8f8c8120e01084715429e09cd657c22fe8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:45:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] freeze_policy.md add recommendation to not upload to unstable
 during the freeze

Closes: #855811
---
 www/buster/freeze_policy.md | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/www/buster/freeze_policy.md b/www/buster/freeze_policy.md
index 0e2e9fc..2e6fb72 100644
--- a/www/buster/freeze_policy.md
+++ b/www/buster/freeze_policy.md
@@ -203,7 +203,10 @@ point.
 We strongly prefer changes that can be done via unstable instead of
 testing-proposed-updates. If there are unrelated changes in unstable, you
 should consider reverting these instead of making an upload to
-testing-proposed-updates.
+testing-proposed-updates. Hence, and also because it may impact other packages
+in unstable that try to migrate to buster, it is recommended to not upload
+changes to unstable in this period that you don't intent to request an unblock
+for.
 
 
 Applying for an unblock
-- 
2.20.1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to