* Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-12 01:41]: > Where a base class has a destructor defined inline, g++ may generate > code for a derived class's destructor that calls an non-inline version > of the base class destructor, but without generating code for the > latter. This is normally masked by the fact that g++ 4.1 now > generates the base-class destructor (aka the non-in-charge destructor) > along with the whole-object destructor (aka the in-charge > destructor), but becomes a problem when linking with code generated by > g++ 4.0. > > See bug #356245 for an example of this. Unfortunately I have not yet > succeeded in writing a simple test case.
Falk, even without a minimal test case, do you think you can forward this upstream. Maybe someone there'll have a good idea. I can also produce pregenerated code for xbsql (the package that fails in #356245) if you want. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
