Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > Personally I prefer to revert the compat bumps when doing backports for > stretch (like in [1]) as I like to to keep the impact on the stable > system as minimal as possible. Pulling in a newer i-s-h is a rather > significant change.
I see. Dropping back to compat 10 is certainly an option, now that I know that only compat 11 is affected. Thing is, this package never used compat 10, so this requires careful review. > Thankfully not as significant as we had between jessie → stretch. So a > backport of i-s-h might indeed be feasible on a cursory glance. Given that it would potentially help several maintainers, could you please give this some more serious consideration? Strictly on the theoretical level, of course. :) -- Thanks, Feri