On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:44:13PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to say it is not a bug. If you want to write a bare URL
> without [url=] tag etc, you need to have some way to know where the URL
> ends. Supose you write "You can look at foo (http://foo/bar)." Here the
> ')' is *not* part of the URL.
>
> --Jeroen
>
> --
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
> http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Hi Jeroen,
I agree with you, I should be using [url=...] tag.
I had to post a message with lots of maps.google.com address and all
of them have '(' and ')' in the URL. But not stopping at ')' will
confuse many users.
Thijs Kinkhorst commented that he agreed that ')' should be recognized
as part of the URL.
I don't think anymore that it should be recognized as part of the URL
when http:// is detected automatically (without [url=...]).
What do you think Thijs?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
