On 31.03.19 00:06, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 25.03.19 20:25, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> On 24.03.19 02:02, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>
>>> So far, so good. I have your packages running on the main webmail server
>>> and the main web server for my university and so far everything is fine,
>>> while default packages and the test1 packages with mpm_event would
>>> normally start showing the symptoms after ~12 hours.
>>
>> Still no problems here and both systems have seen some serious traffic
>> the last days, with the new semester starting next week and all.
> 
> One week later: still no problems here.
> 
> I also did a cross-check with 2.4.25-3+deb9u6 and it died after ~12 hours.
> 
> So from my perspective 2.4.25-3+deb9u7~test2 fixes the problems with
> mpm_event for me.

Last report, because I replaced the test-packages with the ones from the
security repository and switched back to mpm_worker:

I've not seen and problems or even an indication of a problem when I was
runnning the apache2 packages with the fully backported mpm_event. All
servers I tested this on ran flawless, even with active mod_http2. All
those servers would die at least once a week, often more often than that
when running mpm_event with the old packages.

I say: go for it. Please provide this change for the next point release.

Grüße,
Sven.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to