On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 08:12:30PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > BTW: Given that the systemd stuff is part of the upstream package
Ah right, I've confused this with another package I was reviewing at the same time, where the .service file came from the debian/ dir. My bad. On the other hand, I see that your "ddupdate" is a clean reimplementation with no relation to the ddupdate I had been using over a decade ago, thus this is not a regression either. > on what grounds could you state that "autoupdate shouldn't be > systemd-only"? Is there a Debian policy or something similar I have > missed? > > TL;DR Isn't this a plain RFE? A "must" requirement of the policy: §9.11: # [...] any package integrating with other init systems # must also be backwards-compatible with sysvinit by providing a SysV- # style init script with the same name as and equivalent functionality # to any init-specific job, as this is the only start-up configuration # method guaranteed to be supported by all init implementations. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Did ya know that typing "test -j8" instead of "ctest -j8" ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ will make your testsuite pass much faster, and fix bugs? ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
