tisdag 16 april 2019 kl. 18:46:56 CEST skrev du: > On 2019-04-15 Magnus Holmgren <holmg...@debian.org> wrote: > > So it seems that everything should work unless spool_wireformat=true > > *and* SARewriteBody: 1. How do I detect in sa-exim whether wire format > > is used for a given body file though? > > -spool_file_wireformat in the -H file?
I mean from sa-exim.c. We don't read the -H file directly. > I just do not think the reports of breakage where with > spool_wireformat=true, true though. - Nobody mentioned it and it is not > something one set accidentaly. > > I have just uploaded exim 4.92-6 to exoerimental which /should/ > work with sa-exim, allowing you to debug properly. Thanks. So far I haven't managed to reproduce the problem of the malformed body file, though. However, I produced a segfault in local_scan() when I fed exim a spam message using BDAT with report_safe = 1 in local.cf, SARewriteBody: 1 in sa-exim.conf and spool_wireformat = true in exim4.conf(.template). -- Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
