Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi doko,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:15:40 +0200 Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > binutils (2.31.1-16) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Snapshot, taken from the 2.31 branch (20190321). > - Fix PR ld/24355, segfault in function called from ppc_finish_symbols. > * Fix VCS attributes in the control file. Closes: #915982. > * Demote binutils-<target> from Multi-Arch: foreign to Multi-Arch: allowed > (Helmut Grohne). Closes: #920286. I am not fluent in multi-arch, so I can't sanely judge this, but the bug closed here is against gcc-8 and message #15 mentioned a required change in src:gcc-8-cross (which at least hasn't closed this bug yet). So, can this change in binutils go into buster on its own, or does it require more coordination and does it need to go together with other packages? I didn't fully understand Ben's reply in message #20 (probably I need to think harder). Does it mean there are no changes required in src:linux? > * Let binutils-for-host Depends: binutils-<host>:any. > > fixes a ppc specific segfault, and disallows installing an amd64 gcc with a > i386 > binutils. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
