user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 915333 + bsp-2019-04-ca-toronto
thank you
On 2019-04-09 08:46:10, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:05:55 +0200 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:12:17PM +0100, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
>> > > Hello Everyone,
>> > > I own a qnap ts-119pII with a similar cpu.
>> > >
>> > > See attached file with several debugging attempts.
>>
>> I took some time and wanted to reproduce and test this issue.
>>...
>
> What are you planning to do after reproducing it?
>
> Bernhard did debug it back in January,
> and I described what line the problem is.
... and it looks like it's a bug / limitation in ghc itself...
Has anyone considered forwarding this upstream or looked at whether it's
been reported?
Is this a regression?
>From the Toronto BSP's point of view, this is looking more and more like
a "well, this means we won't support that hardware for git-annex" kind
of bug.
A.
--
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes
hurtling down the highway.
- Andrew S. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks"
