Hi Paul, hi wine-team On 09.05.19 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote: > retitle 928014 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2 > reassign 928014 wine-development > usertag 928014 unicode-data-12 > thanks > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:23:17 +0100 Alastair McKinstry > <mckins...@debian.org> wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu >> >> nmu wine-development_4.2-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against >> unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2" > > This package is arch:all. Somebody needs to do a source upload.
The files built with unicode-data are in arch-specific packages, so a binnmu should work. However this would be the first binnmu for the current package layout (Wine's package relationships are a bit tricky with its internal versioned cross-architecture relationships). So although back then I took great care to get it right and successfully tested a binnmu locally, it was never verified for real. On the other side binnmu version numbers are ugly ;) So what do you think, binnmu or new source upload? Greets jre
