Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Eduard Bloch:
> Package:
> Severity: normal
> User:
> Usertags: unblock
> Please advise how to process with a required fix for the package 
> apt-cacher-ng.
> The change is a one-liner and solves the bug #928957. Without it, the
> cache cleanup will fail for a lot of people in the next couple of years.
> But it touches the upstream source, that's why I would like to release
> it as minor upstream version (3.2.1, currently 3.2, and I am the
> upstream).
> I remember how you handled a similar request of mine a couple of years
> ago, and this time I DEMAND a proper response here before I upload
> anything. Please don't ignore it again for weeks and don't tell me that
> this change is impossible to understand or to estimate WRT consequences;
> it is using an already existing interface in the exact usecase it was
> designed for. (see below)
> Best regards,
> Eduard.
> [...]
Hi Eduard,

I acknowledge that you were not happy with our handling of your previous
unblock request for apt-cacher-ng about two releases ago.  However, I do
not feel this request/email - i.e. the third paragraph of it - is a
productive nor a professional way to go about it.

I will refuse to consider this request at its current tone, but I am
willing to review one written in a professional manner.


Reply via email to