Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Actually, that is 2.0.1-3 from earlier today. -2 was fine.

Oops, yeah, forgot to correct the version pseudo-header.

> Even sadder is that the whole doc-base exercise failed as dhelp_parse flakes
> out on softlinks to directories.

*sigh* AFAICT, it's not absolutely necessary for the paths in doc-base
files to be under /usr/share/doc, so you can see if specifying the
/usr/lib/R/doc/ paths works better.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to