Hi Paul, On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:06PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Am I correct when I say this is no regression? I.e. it has always been > like that?
I am not sure about this. The current mechanism of using the llvm-targets file was introduced in version 8.4.1 [1] replacing the previously hard-coded data layouts. So the faulty Debian patch was introduced during the buster development cycle. [1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/commit/22733532171 > > 2) binNMU on armel, all packages that were built with ghc > > How much are we talking about? This might be a bit big. $ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends ghc -s Package \ /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_buster_main_source_Sources \ | wc -l 1017 It is a bit big, but if everything goes well, it should be painless (i.e., just schedule the binNMUs). On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:55PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Maybe use experimental for this run then? Or debomatic (which I use to > compile for my QNAP as well). In order to use experimental, we will have to prepare source-full uploads for 1017 packages, right? I am not familiar with debomatic, could you please elaborate on this? Thanks, -- Ilias
