Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi! The buildd status on qa.debian.org shows individual architectures using colors and symbols such as ⎇ ∉ ✔ ✘ ∿. Alas, these symbols are arranged by arch name, without grouping into release and non-release archs. This means, it is not obvious at a glance if a given failure is important or not.
Even RC regressions aside, I would like to know if it's a modern arch with real users such as ppc64el or a museal/hobbyist piece such as hppa. While porting to weird archs may uncover real bugs, most of us have sharply limited tuits, and thus would prefer to prioritize. Thus, could you please put all release archs first, -ports later? Meow! . Once, a failure on hppa let me notice that upstream code has a bogus fixed-size assumption on the size of pthread cond var objects. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.0 APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.1.8-00052-ge7ab11e613bf (SMP w/64 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)