Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi!
The buildd status on qa.debian.org shows individual architectures using
colors and symbols such as ⎇ ∉ ✔ ✘ ∿.  Alas, these symbols are arranged
by arch name, without grouping into release and non-release archs.  This
means, it is not obvious at a glance if a given failure is important or not.

Even RC regressions aside, I would like to know if it's a modern arch with
real users such as ppc64el or a museal/hobbyist piece such as hppa.  While
porting to weird archs may uncover real bugs[1], most of us have sharply
limited tuits, and thus would prefer to prioritize.

Thus, could you please put all release archs first, -ports later?



Meow!

[1]. Once, a failure on hppa let me notice that upstream code has a bogus
fixed-size assumption on the size of pthread cond var objects.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.1.8-00052-ge7ab11e613bf (SMP w/64 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Reply via email to