Hi All, I'm sorry if my message come out wrong, and being perceived as unfriendly. That was not my intention, and I'm sorry that people feel that way.
Again, I was trying to say that, we were discussing the public matters that affects the package authors, thus affects the public, and I should have included 928...@bugs.debian.org at the very beginning. And I'm sorry for not having done that sooner, which might have changed everything, or might be not. But I'll start doing it now. On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mo Zhou - lu...@debian.org <pkgoyq.xpt.05ee5440cd.lumin#debian....@ob.0sg.net> wrote: > Hi Tong Sun, > > Please be respectful to the others. Whatever the mail address prefix > the others use, the others have the right to make private discussion > and free speech because these are fundamental rights. I don't know > what happend but your comments are really not friendly. > > If you really received problematic messages from a Debian developer, > please consider reaching out the Anti-harrasment team or DPL for help, > privately. > > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 07:55:04AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote: > >> > > >> > To me, your message, bearing a @debian.org address, should represent > >> > that of debian.org, both privately or publicly, and never says thing > >> that you will regret later, or say it publicly. Especially we are > >> discussing public matters, that affects the public and all authors. > >> > >> Such decision should not be conducted behind close doors. > > >
