On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 12:23:22 +0000 hty81z+5ruj6wk24x...@guerrillamail.com wrote:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html A URL without any comment is a bit laconic. What do you mean? That I should add an OpenSSL linking exception to the GPLv2-or-later license of apt-listbugs? It's not that simple: please read the [bug log] I have already cited. Especially [message #45], which states, in part: [...] | apt-listbugs is GPL-licensed and loads a number of | GPL-licensed Ruby libraries [...] [bug log]: <https://bugs.debian.org/792639> [message #45]: <https://bugs.debian.org/792639#45> I cannot grant a linking exception on behalf of other copyright holders, and I am not the sole copyright holder for apt-listbugs, nor do I hold any copyright in the other GPL-licensed libraries loaded by apt-listbugs. I should ask all those other people for that linking exception, something which I am not going to pursue. Moreover, I do not want to grant that linking exception myself. On the other hand, if you meant something else, sorry for misunderstanding you, but please try and be more explicit. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpIT__QmKzVc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
