Hello Kenneth,

On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 21:17 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just wanted to follow up on  python-configshell-fb.  Back in June,
> you marked a pending upload to remove the epydoc dependency, but the
> bug is still open.   I've filed the package removal request for
> epydoc, and I'm working through all of the reverse dependencies to
> adjust them, so the package removal can proceed.  Could you please
> upload your new package sometime soon?  It would help simplify things
> for me.

So I didn't pay very close attention back when I disabled the
dependency on epydoc.

Thing is, we are shipping a package for the documentation, python-
configshell-fb-doc, which contains the epydoc generated documentation
files. If I drop the epydoc dependency, I am left with an empty package
that I'll have to drop. I would rather prefer to see it still carry the
documentation.

I just checked on the upstream project page and didn't see any bug
reports about the unmaintained epydoc dependency. Maybe they are
unaware of epydoc's current state.

I think best would be to migrate the documentation to the new sphinx
format you mentioned some time back.

My knowledge on documentation is very limited and so is the time these
days. So, if you can help me (or upstream directly) here, that'd help
expedite the upload without the epydoc dependency.

Thanks,
Ritesh

-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to