On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 19:41:08 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > I have managed to work around this today. It requires circumventing the > systemd > prerm failure. I am not recommending that as a final solution, but maybe we > can > have another go at asking the systemd maintainers to review it?
Please do; they might have a better idea of how this can work, and it's them that you'll need to coordinate with for the libsystemd0 and libelogind0 providers of libsystemd.so.0 to not fight (more than they have to) anyway. smcv