Hi, On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:14 AM Felix Lechner <felix.lech...@lease-up.com> wrote: > > Did we get that logic right? Should Lintian perhaps complain instead > when analysing a changes file---which is clearly intended for > upload---versus a dsc file that can hold sources at any stage?
Forgive me. Our original idea works great. There is no way dpkg-buildpackage can do its job, and keep the source and the installation packages (the name binary is a misnomer) together, without producing a *.changes file even though it is unsigned. Lintian also could not analyze both in context without a changes file, even though it is unsigned and not intended for upload. May I please merge !246?
