Hi Ansgar! On 9/3/19 10:11 PM, Ansgar wrote: > That should be "Missing mandatory field 'Section'"; fixed for the future > in dak[1]. > > [1]: > https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/commit/e839612cdeac09be62453801945be2380d614c57
Ah, that makes more sense, indeed. Glad my mistake was able to spot a bug in DAK ;). >> I don't quite understand what the problem with this particular upload is and >> therefore >> don't know how to fix it. Could someone give me a quick heads-up why the >> binary >> packages built on the release buildds got rejected? >> >> FWIW, the builds on the ports buildds were installed without any problems, so >> it must be DAK-specific. > > The binary packages miss a "Section" field; the source packages > d/control had a few unwanted characters before the field that were > introduced in [2]. That's a really obscure mistake and I have no idea how that happened, probably potato fingers with the combination of the possibilities of emacs late at night :). > I submitted a pull request[3]. You might also want to change "Priority: > extra" to "Priority: optional"; "extra" was deprecated in version 4.0.1 > of Debian's Policy. Thanks for the suggestions, I will fix the package tomorrow. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
