> On 19. Sep 2019, at 11:29, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > > Package: augustus > Version: 3.3.3+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > On 2019-09-18 23:34, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> augustus_3.3.3+dfsg-1_mips64el.deb: Built-Using refers to non-existing >> source package libbam-dev (= 0.1.19-4) >> >> >> Mapping sid to unstable. >> >> === >> >> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >> concerns. >> >> >> > > The Built-Using field should use the source package (i.e. > samtools-legacy), not the binary package.
Why? In the build am only using the static library from libbam-dev, not compiling source code from the samtools-legacy source package. Sorry, but this is a serious question as I am not sure what do do here. 7.8 of the policy requires that I have an ‘=‘ version relation on the package listed in ‘Built-Using' — I am not even sure how I would determine that for the source package since it’s not even used in the build? Do I even need to provide a Built-Using here? Searching on code search for libbam-dev and samtools-legacy did not turn up a single case where a Built-Using was set. Thanks Sascha [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924359
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
