On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:54:04PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Right now I see three possible "fixes" for the libgs problem: > [...] > > - fix the code, link to libgs during the build, as is done with all the > > other libraries qgle depends on. I do not understand why libgs is treated > > differently, there may be a reason, I just don't know. I think Laurence is > > working on that, but maybe somebody else working on gle can comment. > > I think this is probably the best strategy, but, as I said, let's hear > what upstream developers have to say on this. > > In the meanwhile, I would like to suggest once more that you upload the > fixes for the serious bug (Qt5 porting) and for the other bug (qgle > segfault)!
Agreed, it would be good if we could move forward with the Qt5 change, we've closing in on the Qt4 removal and this is one of the ~ three dozen packages left. Cheers, Moritz