On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:10:41PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > Source: linguider > > Version: 4.1.1-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: qt4-removal > > > > > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4 > > as [announced] in: > > > > [announced] > > <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00006.html> > > > > Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems > > maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case. > > > > [OpenSSL 1.1 support] > > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828522> > > > > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on > > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get > > removed from the Debian repositories. > > > > Therefore, please take the time and: > > - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 > > port of your application > > - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there > > are > > suitable alternatives for your users > > - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it > > - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian > > archives, consider removing the Qt4 version > > Hi, > There hasn't been any followup on this bug since two years and we're now > moving > forward with the Qt4 removal, are the immediate plans to port linguider to > Qt5 or > should we remove it from the archive?
I've now filed a removal bug. Cheers, Moritz