On Dec 11, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote: > On Dec 11, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > > > there is really no need for a versioned libxcrypt1-dev package. Please > > rename > > that properly to libxcrypt-dev. > Can you be more specific in why this would not be allowed? > Currently I am not building libxcrypt2 and libxcrypt2-dev, but the > package is ready to do it. > libxcrypt1-dev and libxcrypt2-dev cannot be installed at the same time, > but libxcrypt1 and libxcrypt2 can. Do you have any comments on this?
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
