Am Di., 17. Dez. 2019 um 00:52 Uhr schrieb Russell Stuart <russell-deb...@stuart.id.au>: > > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 19:19 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Yes, I missed that. But maybe you have made up your mind now that > > spyne got auto-removed from testing. > > Isn't it better to have an alpha version in testing than no version > > at all? > > As I said in my reply to the bug report, the "no version at all" > scenario seems unlikely to me even if Spyne for Python 3 doesn't get
The "unlikely scenario" is reality NOW. Maybe you did not check but spyne is already gone in testing. That is what I wanted to draw your attention at. > released. But it does seem like Spyne for Python 3 will be stable > before the bullseye deadlines hit. And I will upload it as soon as an I > am aware it has been released. > > Regardless of what happens I use spyne in my day job, so I will > continue to package spyne for Debian. Whether it ends up in Debian is > an open question, but I am a DD :)
