Hi,

Il 03/01/20 22:07, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> Dimitri already agreed in a private discussion that this change was bogus.
> 
> Are there any objections against an NMU reverting the bogus Python 2
> removal in boost1.67?

Totally agree that there is no reason to remote Python 2 support from
boost1.67. Please do the NMU.

Giovanni.
-- 
Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com>
Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to