Hi, Il 03/01/20 22:07, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > Dimitri already agreed in a private discussion that this change was bogus. > > Are there any objections against an NMU reverting the bogus Python 2 > removal in boost1.67?
Totally agree that there is no reason to remote Python 2 support from boost1.67. Please do the NMU. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com> Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature