On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:32:39PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi Boris!
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 13:17, Boris Pek <tehn...@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > similar ping as for qpxtool, last upstream commits are from 2015. Are you
> > > planning to port it yourself or should it be removed?
> >
> > Patch for yagf port to Qt5 already exists at least in Mageia GNU/Linux
> > distro.
> >
> > I may backport this patch to yagf 0.9.3.2 or update yagf package to latest
> > release 0.9.5 and prepare patches with fixes for some regressions in this
> > version of program. (I have not decided yet.)
> >
> > Do you have any time schedule for Qt4 removal? At least preliminary.
>
> As soon as possible. There is already an RC bug in qt4-x11 to avoid
> shipping it in bullseye and, at the the current bug fixing rate, it is
> going to be dropped from testing soon, and it will not return there.
> Once that happens we will be asking for removals even more
> aggressively.
>
> You can also push yagf with the Qt 5 patch to experimental, in that
> way the qt4-based version can be removed from unstable and you will
> not have to pass trough NEW once you consider it ready for unstable.
Status update: Qt4 has now been droppped from testing, qt4 will be removed
from unstable by end of February (along with the remaining rdeps (currently
15)).
Cheers,
Moritz
