Hello Phil,
>Hi Adrien, > >I can use git that is not an issue, but I won't. gbp is a joke - look at >fedora and pagure. I will put out RFS(s), which I have done, you merge >them based on submission or not as I do not care. I have put time in and >submitted updates. You explain to the community how submitters get >treated. I am done with you lot and DM/DD power. sorry if you felt bad for this...I admit I'm having not much time nowadays to keep up with RFS, and for newcomers the process is somewhat slower...I feel sad for your gbp sentence, I like instead it really a lot, next time (if you want of course),you can do something easy such as:git clone repocd repouscangbp import-orig --pristine-tar ../tarball.tar.gzdo your modifications and commitgbp dchfix changelogsend an email requesting sponsorhip without even having to do the RFS. I don't think it is more difficult than your current workflow, but it makes easier to review single changes, and to know why you did and what (if commitmessages are self explanatory). I have to say, at the end your work has gone into the archive, so the time was not lost at all, and I thank you for the nice contribution you did. I only had to revert a Break relationship you had erroneously bumped, and everything else was nice on the first shot, something not easy to be seenon a first RFS bug. Please let me know if you want to contribute more on Debian, I'm pretty sure you have the required skills to do it in the proper way, even if it might bea little bit more difficult than the Fedora approach (and trust me, it used to be even more difficult, now with salsa we at least have one common place forgit repositories) Gianfranco
