On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 13:21, Andreas Beckmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Control: tag -1 upstream
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1068045/linux/5-4-kernel-breaks-prime-synchronization-/
>
> On 10/01/2020 10.37, Raphaƫl Hertzog wrote:
> > We had multiple reports of nvidia users having refresh issues ever since
> > they switched to Linux 5.4.
> >
> > I believe they are affected by the loss of "PRIME synchronization" as
> > explained in 
> > https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1068045/linux/5-4-kernel-breaks-prime-synchronization-/
>
> Luca, can you reproduce something like that?
>
> > There's a patch for 440.44 in that thread but I don't know of any upstream
> > fix. Direct link to patch: https://gitlab.com/snippets/1927096
>
> That patch looks like a crude hack. I have no clue what its intention
> is. The only thing I understood for sure is that it abuses the
> NV_DRM_DRIVER_HAS_GEM_PRIME_RES_OBJ condition, probably by turning it
> into "true". It's also not backwards compatible.
> I'm not going to apply it in the current shape. :-(
>
>
> Andreas

Hi,

I can reproduce, but I agree with you on the review of the patch, it
doesn't look very clean. Given it only affects 5.4 it might be fine to
wait for an upstream fix?

Reply via email to