Hi Norbert, hi all, Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion is in #345604. After the unexpected outcome of the GR, I am not sure if we should jump to conclusions already and move the files back.
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:22 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mon, 03 Apr 2006, Norbert Preining wrote: > > . Why is fontinstallationguide in tetex-doc-nonfree? In TeX live there > > is a source code which is GFDL/Debian [1]. Maybe it is not the > > exact source code? Then it would be better to compile this source code > > and include the output, or? Here we have the additional problem that the PDF uses non-free fonts. > To add one: pdftex-a.pdf is GFDL/Debian, so we shold get the source of > it and should be able to distribute it, too. teTeX does contain the sources: $ dlocate pdftex-t.tex tetex-doc: /usr/share/doc/texmf/pdftex/manual/pdftex-t.tex.gz cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
