On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:05:59PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Here's a thought: > > Given the concern Adrian has expressed relative to tahoe-lafs, how about if > someone uploads the relevant packages to experimental: > > python-txsocksx -> foolscap -> tahoe-lafs > > Then the Unstable rm can go forward, but in the event python2 stays in the > bullseye release, it's easy to re-introduce. It wouldn't even need to go > through New. You'd probably want to upload any other depends that might drop > python2 support as well with a sufficiently high version that they won't get > removed due to NVIU.
How would this bring any advantage? Sandro seems to be working mainly on testing, and RC bugs already exist that prevent re-migration to testing. > Scott K cu Adrian BTW: The Christmas Eve removal in #937449 a few days after removal from testing and despite maintainer objection might be a good example how early removal from unstable makes people not happy.