Le ven. 28 févr. 2020 à 15:45, Reuben Thomas <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 09:00, Paul Courbis BV <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> * What was the outcome of this action? >> Incorrect HTML code : >> îu;&idiaer; >> > > As far as I can tell from looking at the code, these names are correct for > HTML 1.1. The new names are used in HTML 1.2 ( > https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/draft-ietf-iiir-html-01.txt) and later (and > recode generates them correctly for those versions too, though recode only > recognises version 2, not 1.2). > > I'm afraid I can't find a spec for HTML 1.1 online; it seems to be so old > that it's not really considered a standard at all, and in any case there's > no reason to be using it. I'm reluctant to make any changes without > definitive documentation: looking at the code, this coding in recode has > not changed since recode 3.4 in 1994, and François Pinard was pretty > careful about this sort of thing (and both those letters are in his first > language). > My bad These characters where defined by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1866 for HTML 2.0 and echo "î" | recode UTF_8..HTML_2.0 gives the correct answer Sorry about that
