Hi release team! any news on this? There are various bugs in ceph in buster and there was 12.2.13 released in the meantime...
Bernd On 1/7/20 11:37 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > > Hi release-team! > > I have a bit complicated idea for a buster-pu: ceph. > Buster shipped with 12.2.11 and last April upstream released 12.2.12 as > bugfix release. As usual with ceph, the diff is *huge*, but it is a > bugfix-only release. So here are a few facts: > > - upstream changes: https://ceph.io/releases/v12-2-12-luminous-released/ > > - proposed diff: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/compare/luminous%2Funstable...debian%2Fbuster > > - I've basically imported the changes the Ubuntu people have done in > Ubuntu together with 12.2.12. So I assume this should work well, I did > not yet test it properly as I want to wait for a reply from you. I'll > prepare a backport of 14.2.x as soon as it migrates to testing anyway. > > - The issue with ceph is that upstream doesn't do QA for 32bit and our > selection of unusual architectures. I don't know if it builds on all > buildds without trying... > > - 12.2.X is already EOL at ceph upstream.... I just took over the > maintenance of ceph, so... everything is late. Things should be better > for bullseye. > > - The packaging is not yet as close to the upstream packaging as I'd > like to have it. Upstream's packaging is very well tested and > supported, we should stick to that as far as possible. > > For bullseye we'll have the same question: Big updates from upstream as > their pointrelease. Target will probably be 15.2.X (Octopus), which is > not yet released, but I hope it will be before bullseye will go into > freeze. > > > So... whats your opinion on that? > > > Thanks, > > Bernd > -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
