Package: musl-tools Version: 1.1.24-1 Severity: wishlist I just discovered https://bootstrap.debian.net/cross_all/mksh.html seems to be hung up on musl-tools wanting the native compiler.
Wondering whether, if musl-tools were M-A:foreign, it could satisfy cross-compiling dependencies? Perhaps, even if not (and we’d need something else) M-A:foreign won’t hurt? (Cosidering the i386/amd64 case for example.) -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers buildd-unstable APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CRAP Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages musl-tools depends on: ii gcc 4:9.2.1-3.1 ii musl-dev 1.1.24-1 musl-tools recommends no packages. musl-tools suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
